Tenure has long rewarded experienced teachers and ensured their benefits, pay, and job security. However, many education experts today question whether tenure is the best way to keep the best teachers on the job, particularly in light of recent budget cuts that have led some states to resort to teacher layoffs to minimize costs.
The argument is that a teacher who has been on the job for two years may be able to make a greater impact on students than a teacher who has worked in schools for 22 years. By keeping teachers strictly according to longevity, school districts may lose some of their best and brightest faculty, which is not the best choice for students.
Teachers argue that tenure is necessary to allow teachers the freedom to exercise teaching methods that benefit students without as much concern over test results. Which side is right? We will explore arguments for and against teacher tenure and some potential changes in the air.
Layoffs Coming in New York: Who Will be the First to Go?
Like other states, New York faces some tough decisions when balancing the state budget. Mayor Michael L. Bloomberg has warned that layoffs are coming, and many of those who get pink slips will be public teachers in the heart of New York City. According to a recent report at the Wall Street Journal, the city's mayor predicts that more than 6,000 teachers will have to be laid off on his watch. Currently,
